From the category archives:

History

Girault, cont’d

by Renee Corea on March 8, 2010

in History, Research

So there was that hotel stay in 1907—the attack, to use his word.

But two years earlier Girault had published a major article about bed bugs followed by an extensive critical bibliography, likely the entire literature of bed bugs until that time, which unfortunately I haven’t found, though surely much of it is in Usinger… but I wonder if only the useful bits and not the outlandish stuff that one really wants to find. In any case, Girault wrote several articles on the bed bug. We have time for only one.

There is this remarkable passage you should see about his “very unpleasant experiences” during a summer spent in “a small town in Virginia” (Girault studied at Virginia Polytechnic):

The whole place was thoroughly infested, and it was not an uncommon thing to see mattresses and bed-slats turned out to air, which were literally white with the insect’s eggs. The writer’s room was as bad as the rest; the old-fashioned bedstead was full of them, while during the day scores of them could be detected hiding in the walls. The place was almost unbearable, for the insects were not satisfied in staying indoors, but were frequently found secreted in one’s clothes. One night, returning to the room from outside, two were found beneath the collar, while occasionally, one would be found hiding within a pamphlet which was carried in my pocket. Wherever they were very numerous, many could be found frequenting privy-houses or other similar places, where they would be sure to obtain an occasional meal, visiting the host at every chance, night or day. That these insects are very active and freely move from place to place, that is to say, not necessarily confining themselves to certain rooms or houses, and hence not directly dependent upon any one host, is evidently true.

Remarkable, yes? Reminds me of WCW’s hat.

As if that were not vivid enough, Girault continues with this account of a colleague’s bed bug experience in an entomology lab:

Mr. William F. Fiske informed me that when stationed at Tryon, North Carolina, while working in the laboratory at night, bedbugs would crawl along the under sides of the edges of the table and stealthily approaching his bared arms, would attempt to feed.

Girault, A. A. 1905. The Bedbug, Clinocoris (=Cimex=Acanthia=Klinophilos) Lectularia Linnaeus. Psyche 12: 61-74. doi:10.1155/1905/10393

(What’s with Clinocoris… Acanthia? They couldn’t figure out what to call the bed bug at one time? Pity they didn’t ask us.)

I think Girault was having a bit of fun with the following, which he cited from an 1885 source, Lintner:

A correspondent wrote as follows: “ ‘Will you tell us something about the bed-bug, what its habits are, when it “spawns,” what it eats, how long it lives, and if it ever dies? I ask because I have moved into a house that I find was already occupied by several colonies of the pest. The room in which I have my library has the most. They are in my files of papers and periodicals. They seem to grow fatter every day, but for the life of me, I cannot tell what they live on. *******. Can it be that they live on the paste on the wall paper? As for remedies, ******. The latter (red pepper), I have sifted through my papers and books, and wherever I could get it; but instead of driving them off, they seem to fatten on it; ***************.****’ ” pp. 6-7.

And we may laugh at it too, for it is fantastic. What it eats!

Girault called bed bugs abominable. Actually, odious and abominable:

The trouble then is, that definitely stated facts are wanting concerning much of the life-history of this pest. This has doubtless been caused, partly on account of its being so common everywhere, and having an extensive literature, thus causing modern writers to believe it at first glance to be well studied, and partly because of its odious character and abominable nature. The last cause seems to have the most to do with it.

And:

It is the insect most directly affecting man, and the one, if any, which should be thoroughly studied, and yet, not until as late as 1896 (Marlatt, 1896 a) was its true life-history made known.

This is not scientific literature without personality. Girault could say of the body of a first instar that had just fed that it “became stained a very beautiful, deep, purplish red.” Nymphs are described as “sordid yellow.”

Like many, he fed bed bugs himself; except for 5th instars which caused “a distinct itching sensation,” he was not responsive to the bites. These are some of his notes on feeding bed bugs:

A single nymph or larva hatching during the morning of June 24th and isolated in a small glass vial, was fed at once. It was very active after hatching, and at first made attempts to escape, though in a few minutes readily took food. Just as soon as the least bit of blood entered the body it could be traced to its destination, and as more was sucked in, the body became stained a very beautiful, deep, purplish red. The abdomen, at first flt and round in outline, soon became distended, lengthened, and cylindric, and the nymph then measured 2.00 mm.a

On the afternoon of the next day (25th), the nymph was again fed, and the abdomen was much darker, not stained as previously. Again on the morning of July 6th, it was fed. It had not changed. On the morning of July 6th, it fed long and eagerly, until the abdomen became so large and distended that it was all out of proportion to the rest of the body; it was then stained purplish red, as after the first meal. The insect after this gluttonous meal did not lose its usual activity. The first molt then occurred about 7 P. M., 7th July. It had thus fed four (4) times during the first instar.

And his findings on feeding times for each instar:

The nymphs are very voracious, and at a single meal gorge themselves until unable to hold more. The time therefore given to each meal is limited by the capacity or size of the nymph at the time of any one meal, the capacity of course depending upon, or rather being more or less bounded by, the different instars. Hence, in each instar, the time taken for any single meal is more or less definite, shorter in the earlier, longer in the later instars, as the capacity is less in the earlier, greater in the later instars.

For its first meal after hatching, in instar I, it requires on the average, about three (3) minutes to glut itself, and if another meal is taken in this instar, a slightly longer period. In instar II, five (5) minutes; in instar III, six (6) minutes; in instar IV, eight (8) minutes; in instar V, ten (10) minutes, and when adult, from ten (10) to fifteen (15) minutes. These may be taken as averages, as the time for individuals varies somewhat.

He found that adults were unable to re-feed for at least 48 hours.

This is his table detailing the lifespan and the number of eggs deposited for two females, one fed and the other unfed:

Oviposition of fed and unfed female bed bugs - Girault 1905.jpg

oviposition and lifespan of fed and unfed female bed bugs - Girault 1905

I think of Girault sometimes. He pops into my head. I’m glad he was in the world. And wrote about bed bugs.

{ 0 comments }

Girault and the bed bugs

by Renee Corea on March 3, 2010

in History

Alexandre Arsène Girault checked into an elegantly furnished room in one of the best hotels in Cincinnati on October 29, 1907. It was close to midnight. Later he would have occasion to ask the hotel manager if anyone had slept in his room the night before.

Girault worked for the U.S. Bureau of Entomology. He was 23. His major work on chalcid wasps — and the many “eccentricities” that were to shape his tragic life — were in the future.

He takes pains to describe the events of the night in detail. This is his description of the room:

This room was on the second floor, and proved to be a rather small one, about 18 feet long and about 12 feet wide. It was elegantly and neatly furnished, with the walls painted a dark gray and ornamented with mural paintings of flowers; the floor was well carpeted. The bed was of iron, painted black, and the whole room, including the rest of the furniture, presented the usual neat, cleanly, and attractive appearance found in hotels of this class. The room was lighted with two 16-candle power electric globes on a chandelier suspended from the middle of the ceiling, and about six and a half feet above the floor. Also these lights were just about four feet above the bottom third of the iron bedstead; the bed was therefore in full glare of the light. A neat, bronzed steam radiator supplied heat.

The temperature in the room was 75dF.

I found a photograph of a (comparable?) hotel room, c. 1910:

A room in the Chittenden Hotel, Columbus, Ohio, c. 1910 - Library of Congress

And this is Cincinnati in 1907:

Vine Street, Cincinnati, Ohio Digital ID: 69526. New York Public Library

(And for more history, this is the lobby of the Hotel Havlin, one of the grand Cincinnati hotels of this time, but perhaps too grand for the account in question.)

At 12:30 am Girault noticed a third instar nymph on the bedspread:

[T]his nymph was pale. I killed it. After this, I looked the bed over, and finally decided not to get into it, but to lie across it after disrobing, leave the lights on and obtain such sleep as possible under the circumstances.

He left the light on. Like all of us have done.

This lasted half an hour before he saw several bed bugs crawling away from him “swollen with blood” — they were 2nd, 3rd, and 4th instars:

The time was about 1:20 A. M. Between this hour and 3:30 A. M., I dozed off from time to time, lying in the same place, but distinctly remember waking at 2 A. M. and 3:20 A. M. and discovering numerous specimens hurrying away over the coverlid. Each time I arose and killed all of the bugs in sight, and also those, which having been glutted from the host, had left it, crawled 2 or 3 feet away, and were hiding in the bed linen; these latter were discovered after a brief search, and were evidently hiding temporarily. At both of these times, the majority of the insects were in instars III and IV, but two were found in V, and one in I, the latter discovered coolly feeding from my fingers, and from its color, evidently obtaining its first meal. At 2 o’clock, I also killed one or two rather pale nymphs of about instar III, crawling toward the host. No adults were observed.

No adults. And one first instar.

At 3:30 am he called it quits and slept in a rocking chair until 6:00 am.

At 9:00 am he conducted a search of the bed and the room but could not find any bed bugs. There was a suitable crevice at the head of the bed but there were no bed bugs there either. The mattress was a hair mattress with covered springs. He thought they were hiding in the spring coverings. He found no bed bugs and no eggs.

And the previous night’s guests?

I learned through the kindness of the hotel management that the room had been occupied on Oct. 28th by two persons, but in spite of that fact, the bedbugs which I encountered did not seem to have been recently fed. Unfortunately, I could not ascertain whether the bed had been utilized, or whether they spent the night there.

Incredibly, this was not Girault’s first account of what he called “very unpleasant experiences” with old Cimex l. There’s a great deal more, as always! Hopefully we can review some of it next.

A. Arsène Girault, Notes on the Feeding Habits of Cimex lectularius Linnaeus, Psyche, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 85-87, 1908. doi:10.1155/1908/85427

{ 7 comments }

Boing Boing has a picture of a “Disney-logoed DDT-impregnated wallpaper for the kids’ room” c. 1947.

No. words.

Enjoy.

{ 5 comments }

Old timey bed bug news

by Renee Corea on December 10, 2009

in History

Sometimes it is postulated that people were more tolerant of bed bugs in the past. And yet if you actually look what you find is quite resonant with what has been happening to us.

What follows is mostly from the remarkable Historic American Newspapers archive of The Library of Congress: Chronicling America.

(As you value your time, leave that link be!)

The Bedbug Special, 1905

I think this is the earliest mention of steam for bed bugs that I’ve come across, though I’m not entirely sure how it worked.

WAY FOR THE “BEDBUG SPECIAL”!

Union Pacific Sends Out Train to Exterminate Vermin

[By Telegraph to The Tribune]

Cheyenne, Wyo. Sept 3.—An extra train, called the “Bedbug Special,” has just been sent out by the Union Pacific to exterminate bedbugs and other vermin in the section houses along the road. It is equipped with steam hose, poisons and disinfectants. Steam from the engine will be used.

New-York Tribune, September 4, 1905

The only other reference I can find is a note in Popular Mechanics.

THE “BEDBUG” SPECIAL

Probably the only train in the world of its kind and name is now going over the main line and branches of the Union Pacific. It is equipped with all modern appliances for exterminating bugs and insects of all kinds, and will fumigate all the section houses on the system. Steam from the engine is carried to the car where it is mixed with poisons or disinfectants according to requirements, and the building sprayed inside and out by means of hose and suitable nozzles.

Popular Mechanics, November 1905

You think they actually ran steam hoses from the train to the station houses (where foremen and crew lived)?

The Prussian railways

How about treating infested cars? Check out the innovations that surely make modern methods mere reinventions:

SCIENTIFIC MISCELLANY – A Disinfecting Oven for Cars

Cars on the Prussian railways—especially those used for Russian traffic—are often infested with vermin, and a new process of the Julius Pintsch Co. has been adopted for destroying bedbugs, nits, and disease germs without removal of cushions or fittings and without injury to varnish or polish. A disinfecting cylinder of cast iron, 16 1/2 feet in inside diameter and long enough to inclose the car, is used. This is closed at the ends by cast iron heads, and is air-tight and capable of withstanding enormous pressure. The total weight is 297,000 pounds. The car is run into the cylinder, and the temperature is raised by live steam to 114 deg. to 122 deg., when the air is pumped out to a pressure of one-tenth of the normal, the heat being still maintained. Formalin vapor is then introduced. In a test of the plant, the thorough heating of the car required about five hours, rarefying the air took two hours, but disinfectin with formalin was a quick process. Bed bugs and nits were effectively destroyed. Vestibule and dining cars with ceilings, walls and floors that had become wet through were inclosed in the heated vacum for 24 hours, and were dried in a surprisingly thorough manner. Allowing 10 hours for the disinfection of a car, it is estimated that the total expense is $8.33, ot more than a tenth of the cost of the less complete cleansing by the old methods.

Amador Ledger (Jackson, Amador County, CA) April 22, 1910

A heat chamber and a very big one at that as early as 1910.

$8.33 in 1910 is about $194.73 in 2008 dollars.

Old timey bed bug lawsuits

Continuing our trains theme, why is this one not at all surprising:

BEDBUG POISON EXPLODED

Pullman Car Porter Wants Two Thousand Dollars—A Novel Suit.

Special to the Herald.

San Antonio, Texas, March 20.—Alleging that he was injured by the explosion of bedbug poison which he was applying to the mattresses of a Pullman sleeping car, Henry Caviness, a porter, filed suit yesterday in the 57th district court of San Antonio for two thousand dollars damages. He declares that he was not warned that the poison was not only deadly as a bath for the obnoxious insects, but that it was equally deadly as an explosive, so when he struck a match to light a cigarette, the stuff exploded and damaged him and the cigarette almost as much as the bedbugs.

Palestine Daily Herald (Palestine, TX) March 20, 1908

Landlord/tenant cases:

BUGS FIGURE IN DECISION

Colorado Judge Decides Bed Bugs Justify Damage Suit.

According to a dispatch to the Miami Metropolis from Denver, Colorado, Justice Carlon, of that city, has decided that money paid by a guest to a boarding house keeper for a room in which bed bugs exist must be refunded.

Sleerman Goodwin, of Denver, who paid $3.50 for a room at the boarding house of Mrs. Henry Hewett, sued her for $25. Goodwin alleged that he paid $3.50 for a room for himself and family and that during the night an army of bed bugs attacked them. Mrs. Hewett indignantly asserted that Goodwin carried the bugs into the house.

The precedent that a room frequented by bed bugs need not be paid for by an occupant is established.

The Pensacola Journal (Pensacola, FL) September 01, 1907

This 1880 case featured expert testimony:

THE LEGAL STATUS OF BED BUGS

Campbell O. Bishop appeared before Judge Thayer recently, and urged his motion for a new trial in the case of Peckham vs. Garvey. It will be remembered that the defendant, Dick Garvey, the railroad ticket agent, was sued by the landlord of a fashionable hash-house for a month’s board, and pleaded bed-bugs in bar. The room had been engaged for a month, but the lodger decamped the second day, because he went there to eat, and not to be eaten. He testified that the bed-bugs preyed upon him worse than a guilty conscience, and he could not sleep. The jury gave the landlord a verdict for half the amount claimed. Mr. Bishop argued that the instructions were erroneous and the verdict ought to be set aside. He cited a number of English authorities in support of his motion, and one or two of them seemed exactly in point. The law, as laid down on the other side of the water, is that when a man rents a furnished room the landlord guarantees that it is habitable and wholesome. If his slumbers are disturbed by bed-bugs, he has the right to abandon the premises without notice, and is not bound to pay any rent for the time he has tarried. A case was cited in which the witness gave full details of the manners and habits of English bed-bugs, which are supposed to belong to the same breed as the American insect. [...] An English expert stated that it was very difficult to exterminate a colony of these insects. [...]

I’ll say. An English expert?

Sacramento Daily Record-Union, June 12, 1880

Sad history of bed bug committees, etc.

FAIR DOCTORS RAP BEDBUGS

Wisconsin Association to Battle It and Other Insects

MILWAUKEE.—Bedbugs were solemnly denounced by the Wisconsin Medical Women’s Association in annual session here. Dr. Adeline Riddle of Oshkosh, president of the association, characterized the bedbug as one of the greatest enemies to public health. [...] The women doctors passed resolutions authorizing the appointment of a committee to confer with the state board of health with reference to a public educational campaign on flies, bedbugs and other germ carriers.

University Missourian (Columbia), September 20, 1910

An infested bedstead at auction

A joke, containing the line:

Did Alexander the Great have boils? Never, not a one! And why?

Omaha Daily Bee. (Omaha), September 09, 1880

{ 0 comments }

The Road to Wigan Pier:

House in Peel Street. Back to back, two up, two down and large cellar. [...] Distance to lavatory 70 yards. Four beds in house for eight people—two old parents, two adult girls (the eldest aged twenty-seven), and one young man and three children. Parents have one bed, eldest son another, and remaining five people share the other two. Bugs very bad—“You can’t keep ‘em down when it’s ‘ot.”

Orwell seemed ambivalent about slum clearance, or perhaps not, just wishful reading:

I sometimes think that the price of liberty is not so much eternal vigilance as eternal dirt. There are some Corporation estates in which new tenants are systematically deloused before being allowed into their houses. All their possessions except what they stand up in are taken away from them, fumigated and sent on to the new house. This procedure has its points, for it is a pity that people should take bugs into brand new houses (a bug will follow you about in your luggage if he gets half a chance), but it is the kind of thing that makes you wish that the word “hygiene” could be dropped out of the dictionary. Bugs are bad, but a state of affairs in which men will allow themselves to be dipped like sheep is worse. Perhaps, however, when it is a case of slum clearance, one must take for granted a certain amount of restrictions and inhumanity.

{ 0 comments }

Of considerable tact and other incongruities

by Renee Corea on October 13, 2009

in History

1982

A.G. Wheeler, Jr. (1982) Somebody’s Been Sleeping in My Bed! A Comprehensive Look at the Infamous Bed Bug, a Pest that has Plagued Man Since the Beginning of Civilization. Pest Control Technology 10(2): 38-44 [article is a revised excerpt from Mallis 6th ed.] AFPMB library accession number: 111083:

Despite the development of insecticide resistance in certain populations, bed bugs are no longer regarded as common household pests. Most pest control specialists probably make fewer than a dozen bed bug calls each year, and some have never seen an infestation.

Bed bug problems, however, still occur, in the most luxurious of homes, and the pest control operator must be prepared to treat an insect with which he has had little experience. Pratt (1958) cautions that because most homeowners still think of this pest as a sign of slovenly housekeeping, the control specialist should use considerable tact when investigating problems, especially in more affluent surroundings.

1990

Byron Reid (1990) Don’t Let the Bedbugs Bite. Pest Control 58(6): 48-50 AFPMB library accession number: 148825:

Indeed, their principal medical importance is associated with the itching associated with their bites. Far more important is the social stigma associated with bedbugs, which arises from the public’s perception that bedbug infestations arrive because of poor personal hygiene and bad housekeeping.

There was a time when pest control operators received calls about infestations of bedbugs on a regular basis.

However, in the last 40 years the incidence and prevalence of bedbug infestations has been greatly reduced by synthetic organic insecticides. Development of effective, persistent residual insecticides has made control of bedbug infestations a relatively easy matter. As a result, the frequency of bedbug control infestations and the need for control operations have dropped to their current low levels.

This situation, while beneficial to human populations in general, has had the unfortunate side effect of giving most pest control operators little opportunity to gain practical experience in dealing with this most challenging insect pest. But in this and other industrial countries, the well-publicized rise in people living in substandard housing and in the street has been associated with an increase in bedbug infestations.

Bonus (Reid, 1990):

But even with today’s effective insecticides, poor inspections causing failure to find all bedbug hiding places will result in inadequate control. So just as with all other pest control situations, the first step in controlling bedbugs is to thoroughly inspect the premises and define the extent of infestation.

{ 0 comments }

The vermin in the walls is wicked

by Renee Corea on September 8, 2009

in History

One of the landmarks of British documentary film, the short film Housing Problems (1935) depicts the plight of people living in overcrowded and dilapidated housing. It is a slum clearance propaganda film and one worth thinking about. (It was funded by The Gas Light and Coke Company, though no overt gas use propaganda is in the film; but it’s not difficult to see how the filmmakers could interest them in a film about a massive new housing construction scheme.)

The Stepney (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) residents, speaking directly to the camera, recount the stories of their deprivations. Mr. Norwood is “not only overrun with bugs,” but also mice and rats and speaks of the loss of his children. And Mrs. Hill speaks of the filth and the vermin.

Here is a useful partial transcript of Mrs. Hill’s strangely affecting statement:

We went to see the new houses, and they’re lovely. But here, it gets on your nerves, for everything’s filthy: dirty, filthy walls, and the vermin in the walls is wicked. I’ll tell you, we’re fed up.

Yes, and guess who makes a cameo?

This film is available in a DVD from the BFI; not in the US however.

But a sizeable clip is up on youtube. If you are going to watch it, the bit with Mrs. Hill and old Cimex l. starts around the 3:31 mark.

How exactly were people moved to their new homes? What was the bed bug “disinfestation” process? We’ll consider that next.

{ 0 comments }

Millard’s Intercepting Trench Trap for Bugs

by Renee Corea on September 7, 2009

in History

Millard invented a trap, should I have told you about that first?

He named his trap the “Leicester Intercepting Trench Trap”:

It depends for its action upon the habits of the insect as described above, and the principle of it is the placing of an impassable trench, containing sticky stuff, all round the bug-infested room. It consists of a grooved lath of wood cut into the required lengths. Treacle (golden syrup) is poured into the groove or trench, and the trench is left in situ as long as may be necessary. Sufficient time has not yet elapsed to enable me to pronounce a final verdict as to its utility, but in theory it seems excellent, and it certainly “delivers the goods.” I have counted as many as thirty-six bugs in 12 inches of trench after being in position three weeks and thirty-one were counted in a 3-foot length after only three nights.

Millard's Leicester Intercepting Trench Trap.jpg

Millard, C. Killick. 1932. Presidential Address, on An Unsavoury but Important Feature of the Slum Problem. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 53, no. 7: 365-372. doi:10.1177/146642403205300705

Yes, well.

Stay away from the treacle is my advice.

{ 0 comments }

Anti-bug conscience

by Renee Corea on September 7, 2009

in History

How did they do it? The numbers of bed bug infestations fell significantly in the inter-war years in Britain. Well before DDT. The answer, it turns out, is in the wholesale reorganization of housing for the poor.

Grievously for us, I believe, the slum clearance and rehousing movement of the 1930s exploited and perpetuated the stigma of bed bugs. Can I share with you this depressing and disturbing history?

First up, the medico-moral vanguardist Dr. Millard.

“That unsavoury feature of slum life”

It is July 14, 1932 and two hundred doctors have heard presentations on unventilated offices and milk pasteurization. But the subject of Dr. C. Killick Millard’s presidential address to the Society of Medical Officers of Health is bed bugs.

It is not a subject for polite company. Notice, too, that the single word bug, always and exclusively meaning bed bugs in the literature of this period, is used almost throughout.

Millard fears that “the extent of the evil is probably not realised”:

I fancy there are many people who flatter themselves that theirs is a “clean” town, who would have rather a shock if they looked closely behind the loose wallpaper in most of the old houses in their poorer districts!

With such disgust—not to say loathing—are bugs regarded by the well-to-do classes that it is considered bad form even to mention the word in polite society; but at a meeting such as this no apology is needed for dwelling upon the subject in some detail.

Millard, C. Killick. 1932. Presidential Address, on An Unsavoury but Important Feature of the Slum Problem. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 53, no. 7: 365-372. doi:10.1177/146642403205300705

Millard appears ready to assert that bed bugs are a public health pest and, moreover, render homes “unfit for human habitation.” However, if one is at first inclined to like Millard, “the enlightened Medical Officer of Health for Leicester” in the words of a contemporary, his ambivalent thoughts on the causes and features of bed bug infestations soon give pause to any budding sympathy:

It is certainly not fair to put all the blame for the presence of bugs in a house upon the tenant. No doubt the tenant has his responsibility in the matter, and the tenants of bug-infested houses are not usually the cleanest of people; but often they are to be pitied as much as blamed. They will tell you, and in many cases I dare say truthfully, that there were bugs in the house when they first went into it; that they have been at no end of trouble trying to get rid of them; that they have got up in the night to search for them; that they have spent a lot of money in buying “stuff” with which to exterminate them; but that, whilst they may get rid of them for a time, they always come back again, especially in warm weather.

The fact is that effective disinfestation of an old house in the slums is a most difficult matter, even for a health department with all its resources; still less is it easy for the tenant without those resources. The bug is a most hardy insect, and the chances of survival are largely in its favour.

The bug-infested house is part of the slum problem, and we shall not solve the slum problem merely by putting the blame on the slum-dweller.

So which is it, Dr. Millard? The near impossibility of eradication or bed bugs and filth again?

One may find bugs in a clean house occupied by clean people, and conversely there may be no bugs in a dirty house. But, speaking generally, a really clean housewife will not tolerate either dirt or bugs.

It occurs to me, knowing what we know now about the distribution of bed bugs in society when the infestation rate is high (well, like ours), that this exception for the “really clean housewife” is obligatory. That audience of medical health officers may have known bed bugs more intimately than they would have cared to admit.

It becomes necessary then to draw distinctions.

For the conditions that favor bed bug infestations according to Millard are:

1. Old houses in which there are many good hiding-places for bugs.

2. Proximity to other bug-infested houses; bugs may spread from one house to another.

3. Overcrowding. Often the bedsteads and cots are so closely together than the difficulty in searching out bugs is greatly increased.

4. Lack of facilities, e.g. absence of gas or electric light in bedrooms, which increases the difficulty of searching at night time when the bugs come out.

5. Lastly—and this, of course, is a most important factor—lack of determination on the part of the tenants to exterminate this pest, no matter how great the trouble involved.

Lack of determination? Bed bugs as personal failure. We will see this again.

And yet, as Millard describes the methods of eradication then in use, fumigation by hydrogen cyanide, ethylene oxide, sulphur dioxide, and formaldehyde, I want to note his mention of “liquid vermifuges”:

They all have their advocates, but the price of many of them seems quite unnecessarily high. Possibly a recipe given in Cummings’s brochure, consisting of an emulsion of paraffin, soft soap and water, is as efficacious as most other liquid vermifuges, and it has the advantage of being very cheap. Most liquids sold or used as vermifuges are efficacious provided you can spray the liquid direct on to the insects, but the difficulty is to do this. There is always the probability that a few bugs or eggs will escape destruction and cause the trouble to reappear.

That does sound difficult, doctor.

“The bug is the enemy of man”

If bed bugs are abominable, nearly impossible to control, and yet people living in slums are somehow themselves partly to blame, the solution, then, is a campaign of shame:

It must be remembered, however, before we judge others too harshly, that many of the class we are considering have been accustomed to the presence of bugs, more or less, all their lives, and familiarity has therefore bred indifference. Part of a complete campaign against the bed-bug must be to organise propaganda with a view to arousing an “anti-bug conscience.” I believe that if this were done, equally good results could be achieved as has been the case, in some cities at any rate, with pediculus capitis or the head louse. In Leicester, before the days of medical inspection of school children and of young factory entrants, head lice were so common that only a minority of girls had really clean heads. To-day I think I may say that it is the exception to find a dirty head. It has come to be looked upon as somewhat of a disgrace for a girl to have “things in her hair.”

[Emphasis added]

Before we judge others too harshly?

This is the goal, to look upon bed bugs as a disgrace. And I think we’ll find that their project entirely succeeded.

{ 0 comments }

So I have apparently lied for here I have for your amusement, whether you want to or not, Bacot’s outhouse.

Bacot, A.W. (1914). The influence of temperature, submersion and burial on the survival of eggs and larvae of Cimex lectularius. Bull. Ent. Res. 5, 111-17

First of all, why was Bacot burying bed bug eggs in sand, plaster and what not? Actually this is very cool; they asked him:

The point at issue was the possibility of eggs of the common bed-bug, Cimex lectularius, surviving the process of house-destruction when the plaster from old walls, on which eggs had been laid, was broken down and remixed with fresh mortar for making the partitions of rooms in new tenements; such survival having been given as an explanation for previously unoccupied houses being infested with bugs.

I really have to bet that this is indeed the source of the universally cited 18 months, no? Check it out:

Moderate conditions; after feeding. After a single meal one newly hatched bug out of three lived for 270 days; while, out of 30 immature bugs in various stages of development, 7 were living and able to feed after a fast of 18 months. In this case the box in which they were confined was kept in an outhouse.

Emphasis added.

I know what you’re thinking because that is what I was thinking, but he describes the box as a glass-bottomed entomological box within another box. (?)

Anyway, here’s a bit more, I know you like mortality tables like I do:

excerpt, mortality, unfed, after burying in sand (Bacot, 1914)

Survival of unfed bed bug first instars (Bacot, 1914)

Oh yeah, the chilling, thawing, rechilling? That’s a reference to newly hatched bugs subjected to temperatures of 28dF-32dF. Also he observed that:

When subjected to cold, moist air after a full meal they are liable to a heavy or even total mortality—probably in consequence of humidity rather than cold.

{ 0 comments }